|
HS Code |
854829 |
| Scientific Name | Enterococcus faecium |
| Gram Stain | Gram-positive |
| Shape | Coccus (spherical) |
| Motility | Non-motile |
| Spore Forming | Non-spore forming |
| Oxygen Requirement | Facultative anaerobe |
| Optimal Temperature | 35-37°C |
| Salt Tolerance | Can grow in 6.5% NaCl |
| Habitat | Intestinal tract of humans and animals |
| Probiotic Use | Yes, used as a probiotic |
| Antibiotic Resistance | Often exhibits resistance, including to vancomycin |
| Catalase | Catalase negative |
| Primary Function | Fermentation and competitive exclusion of pathogens |
| Colony Appearance | Small, round, creamy to white colonies on agar |
| Disease Association | Can cause nosocomial infections in immunocompromised hosts |
As an accredited Enterococcus Faecium factory, we enforce strict quality protocols—every batch undergoes rigorous testing to ensure consistent efficacy and safety standards.
| Packing | Sealed white plastic container labeled "Enterococcus Faecium, 100g" with batch number, expiry date, and safety symbols printed on the label. |
| Container Loading (20′ FCL) | Container Loading (20′ FCL) for Enterococcus Faecium typically accommodates 12-14 metric tons, securely packaged in sealed, food-grade polyethylene bags. |
| Shipping | Enterococcus faecium is shipped as a lyophilized culture or in a secure, leak-proof container, compliant with biological substance regulations. The package includes ice packs or dry ice for temperature control and is clearly labeled with appropriate hazard information. Shipping adheres to guidelines for transporting non-pathogenic microorganisms. |
| Storage | **Enterococcus faecium** should be stored in tightly sealed containers, protected from light and moisture. For long-term storage, maintain cultures at -80°C in glycerol stocks or freeze-dried (lyophilized) at 2–8°C. Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles to preserve viability. Ensure storage area is clean and labeled, complying with biosafety regulations, as E. faecium is a biosafety level 2 organism. |
| Shelf Life | The shelf life of **Enterococcus faecium** preparations is typically 12–24 months when stored in a cool, dry place, away from sunlight. |
|
Purity 99%: Enterococcus Faecium with a purity of 99% is used in probiotic dietary supplements, where it enhances gut flora balance and improves gastrointestinal health. Viability 1x10^9 CFU/g: Enterococcus Faecium with a viability of 1x10^9 CFU/g is used in animal feed formulations, where it increases feed conversion efficiency and promotes livestock growth. Heat Stability up to 80°C: Enterococcus Faecium with heat stability up to 80°C is used in pelleted feed manufacturing, where it maintains probiotic activity during processing. Moisture content <5%: Enterococcus Faecium with moisture content below 5% is used in encapsulated probiotic preparations, where it ensures extended shelf life and microbial stability. Particle Size D90 <100 μm: Enterococcus Faecium with a particle size D90 less than 100 μm is used in powdered foods, where it enables uniform dispersion and improved bioavailability. pH Resistance 2.0–9.0: Enterococcus Faecium with pH resistance from 2.0 to 9.0 is used in fermented dairy products, where it survives gastric acidity for effective colonization. Antibiotic Resistance Profile: Enterococcus Faecium with a defined antibiotic resistance profile is used in veterinary applications, where it reduces the risk of antimicrobial resistance transfer. Shelf Life 24 Months: Enterococcus Faecium with a shelf life of 24 months is used in pharmaceutical probiotic capsules, where it maintains viability during long-term storage. Genetic Stability: Enterococcus Faecium with documented genetic stability is used in clinical trial formulations, where it ensures consistent strain performance and safety. |
Competitive Enterococcus Faecium prices that fit your budget—flexible terms and customized quotes for every order.
For samples, pricing, or more information, please contact us at +8615371019725 or mail to sales7@bouling-chem.com.
We will respond to you as soon as possible.
Tel: +8615371019725
Email: sales7@bouling-chem.com
Flexible payment, competitive price, premium service - Inquire now!
Over decades in the microbial fermentation industry, bringing Enterococcus faecium from cell line to finished powder has proven to be one of our most demanding and rewarding bioprocesses. We’ve learned a lot as a manufacturer—what it takes to consistently cultivate, stabilize, and deliver a strain trusted by feed producers and vet formulators alike. Many promises are made in the microbial product landscape. Experience has shown us that batch discipline, substrate integrity, and careful downstream handling spell the difference between enterococci that thrive after application and those that miss their mark. Creating Enterococcus faecium is not simply a checklist exercise: from strain selection onward, each step directly affects what farmers and feed integrators observe in their livestock health and productivity. We value the importance of transparency and clear expectations around what this organism can offer, so let’s take a practical, ground-level look at what makes high-quality Enterococcus faecium worth relying on.
In poultry and swine production, Enterococcus faecium supplementation has grown from a point of curiosity to a concrete management tool for gastrointestinal health and stability. As a lactic acid bacterium, it offers a combination of rapid growth, robustness under harsh pelleting, and antagonistic effects against recognized pathogens. Rigorous studies have shown that relevant strains can enhance digestibility, support a balanced gut flora, and create a local environment less favorable for Salmonella and E. coli. As a manufacturer, we assess these practical outcomes on multiple fronts—first in strain selection, and next in every fermentation and stabilization run. Not all Enterococcus faecium powders reflect this track record. The key lies in surviving both the production process and the real-world environment of feed or gut transit. That’s where our investment in continuous monitoring and process control enters the picture.
Many customers approach us with a general idea—requesting “Enterococcus faecium” for their application. It’s tempting to imagine all E. faecium are created equal, yet reality draws hard lines. Each production run begins with a foundation: strain selection. After years of testing, we chose strains with proven bioenergetics and stability both at the bench and in field trials. Not only do these strains demonstrate screens such as bile resistance, acid tolerance, and rapid onset of metabolic activity, but also a record of survival through downstream pelleting, high-pressure processing, and humid environments in storage. Each model—be it concentrated cell mass or custom carrier-based powder—takes a unique path through fermentation scale-up, harvesting, freeze-drying, and carrier blending. This brings flexibility. The bulk model, for example, focuses on high CFU counts per gram, optimized for feed mill integration at limited inclusion rates. The granular forms cater to veterinarians and formulators where compatibility with liquid or semi-wet carriers is central. We verify each parameter batch by batch, allowing for honest disclosure to buyers. This hands-on connection with the whole process means claims about the number and stability of viable cells come with a high level of certainty.
Any technical sheet can list colony forming units or moisture content. What we prioritize is a specification set rooted in real-life requirements. After years in this business, we know the biggest challenge isn’t just meeting a CFU count at the time of packaging—it’s keeping these counts robust for months under storage and after mixing with feed basal diets and premixes. Our Enterococcus faecium production focuses on two key outputs: high-viability powder at or above 1010 CFU/g, with carefully measured moisture below 7%. We’ve seen from extensive internal and third-party shelf life testing that crossing these lines leads to sharp reductions in viability before the product even reaches animals or end users. Each batch is tested over several months of storage conditions that mirror real-life shipping and warehouse environments, not just ideal lab benches.
Another factor often overlooked is the carrier base—whether lactose, maltodextrin, or custom inert blends. If you’ve ever dealt with powder caking, poor flow, or dust emission during handling, you appreciate why we won’t rush this step. Too dry a powder leads to static and application problems; too moist, and spoilage risk rises. Over years, we’ve tailored our physical form for steady handling at both feed mills and smaller veterinary clinics, learning from customer feedback and real-world corrections, not imagination.
Fermentation is where the heavy lifting happens. In our facility, the process starts with a rigorously maintained starter culture. Every production run passes internal purity tests—PCR and classic microbiological streaks—to exclude unwanted bacteria, fungi, or phage. Industrial fermenters run on nutrient-rich media, supplying carbon and nitrogen sources the strain handles optimally, with tight control of oxygen, pH, and temperature. This isn’t just about maximizing biomass—it’s about securing a healthy, high-energy cell population that transitions well through drying. Repeatability matters. We log every critical point from harvest to post-drying CFU checks. Batches failing to exceed the internal quality threshold never reach formulation. This level of control comes from the stakes—animal health and the trust of our long-standing partners.
Downstream, we invest in freeze-drying and vacuum blending. We’ve found this protects against temperature swings common in global shipping. The learning curve has taught us that even small deviations in thermal stability ruin post-application viability. For every batch, end-point testing doesn’t just look for cell number. We screen for metabolic signatures and core traits like acidification rate, since these shape the real-world benefit in an animal’s gut.
Much of the recognition Enterococcus faecium enjoys in animal health doesn’t come from speculation but from repeated, confirmed field benefit. For broiler producers, using our product in starter feeds often shows gains in performance metrics—better feed conversion ratios, reduced pathogen shedding, more consistent flock weights. Swine producers observe steadier gut conditions during weaning, a notoriously stressful period. We’ve had direct feedback from multiple integrators who switched from other lactic acid bacteria after seeing more enduring shelf life and less loss of CFU under local humidity and mixing practices.
In aquaculture, the resilience of our Enterococcus faecium when blended with high-protein floating pellets has played a real role in supporting water quality, cutting down on waste metabolites and offering a digestive advantage to young fish and shrimp. There are no shortcuts: not every batch of feed, nor every system, is equal; so we routinely troubleshoot, test new lots alongside customer teams, and monitor the results for clarity. We’ve seen that handling conditions, mixing order, and even local water chemistry matter and routinely offer guidance for these realities, since our own business stays healthy only when the product works in the field.
Selecting Enterococcus faecium over other probiotic bacteria is rarely a random choice. Many feed supplementers previously leaned toward blends dominated by Bacillus spp. or certain Lactobacillus strains. Our experience manufacturing these lines lets us speak with confidence about the pros and cons. Enterococcus faecium’s advantage stems from rapid doubling capability under field temperatures, resilience in pelleted ration production, and broad compatibility with acidifiers and coccidiostats in feed mixes. High spore-formers like Bacillus have their place, offering longer shelf lives under severe tropical storage.
However, enterococci hold their cell membrane stability under refrigeration and moderate heat, making them better candidates where pelleting temperatures are controlled, or in liquid suspensions requiring prompt biological action. Some users voice concern about antibiotic resistance; as manufacturers, we address this during the strain screening stage, genomically confirming the absence of problematic markers. By narrowing our product lines to only those E. faecium strains documented as safe and approved for livestock use in major regulatory regions, we cut through uncertainty that cloud third-party blends.
Another key difference from generic blends is predictable fermentation kinetics and pH impact; our Enterococcus faecium launches lactic acid production swiftly and predictably, without the lag observed in some multi-strain blends. Formulators wanting immediate acidification in the foregut of poultry appreciate this, along with the bump in available energy extraction—something rarely seen with late-acting or less robust lactic acid producers.
Consistently high quality begins in the lab, but survives only through honest manufacturing discipline. From the earliest days, we maintained detailed digital and paper trails—strain lineage, input lot numbers, every batch record. External audits by third-party certifiers remain regular fixtures, pushing us to keep all materials human- and animal-safe, and fully traceable. Our team runs both scheduled and random proficiency checks through HPLC, plate counts, and direct molecular assays. We routinely validate our product with independent partner labs, updating thresholds if required by new data. It’s an approach built on trust. As a manufacturer, we can’t afford to ship uncertainty—or blame loss of viability on “conditions out of our control.” If a feed mill or field trial requests a breakdown of fermentation histories or preservation steps, we are prepared and transparent.
We believe traceability is not simply about ticking boxes but about real-world accountability. Our finest quality-testing moments have come in challenging years—when some inputs may vary or supply chain disruptions put pressure on the timetable, only relentless adherence to our quality plan keeps product from ever leaving until it meets the mark. This attitude sets true manufacturers apart from traders or brokers who lack hands-on engagement with each production stage.
Many headlines about “probiotic failure” or “quality inconsistencies” ultimately point to gaps in manufacturing culture—not limits in the organism itself. We’ve navigated contaminated raw materials, non-sterile transfer environments, and batch deviations. The solution isn’t an after-the-fact apology; instead, we design our facility for process isolation, double-verify air and water supply quality, and train our team with an eye toward extremely low error tolerance in sterile handling. Over time, we’ve seen that customers willing to visit our site and roll up sleeves for joint troubleshooting develop stronger confidence in both the science and practicality of our approach.
Some manufacturers claim ultra-high CFU counts, but too often inflate numbers that don’t last outside the jar. We focus instead on delivering a robust number, validated during long-running shelf life studies in the most challenging regions we serve. We recognize that regulatory guidelines around Enterococcus faecium continue to evolve—from labeling mandates to allowed strains—so we stay tightly connected to developments in EFSA, FDA, and other authorities, updating processes whenever limits or expectations shift.
After two decades active in global probiotic manufacturing, we see three immediate needs facing the Enterococcus faecium market. First, not all regions enforce the same set of safety screens for strain genome stability and resistance genes. To bridge that, our in-house genomics lab runs routine sequencing—offering direct reports to buyers unsure of regulatory alignment. No factory shortcuts justify risk; traceable, low-risk strains are the only responsible future.
Second, storage and distribution standards need real-world modernization. We have replaced legacy packaging with advanced foil-laminate pouches and custom desiccants, plus heavy batch validation during hot-season shipping cycles. Each time a feed mill returned an underperforming lot, we took the lesson to heart, upgrading packaging or transport protocol accordingly.
Third, manufacturing is on the cusp of even tighter digitalization. We are bringing online more process sensors and direct MES (Manufacturing Execution System) tracking to reduce human error, speed quality feedback loops, and empower our QC teams to see trends before they cause issues. This isn’t simply hype—it’s how a factory faces the growing scrutiny and opportunity in live microbial manufacturing.
Among the crowd, quality Enterococcus faecium stands out. Years in fermentation teach patience, discipline, and respect for both biology and customer priorities. Gut health is more than a marketing claim; it’s a living connection between good science, hands-on production, and field results. Each bag leaving our line represents batches of small refinements, real stress tests, and open learning with our end users. We invite questions, welcome audits, and embrace correction because in this sector, only the strongest links between science and practice survive. Our experience guides every step, and we know that every customer’s livestock and operations depend on our one-off decisions made in the factory every day.
True confidence in probiotics comes from trusting people and systems proven over time. As peer manufacturers know, cheap or haphazard lines fail quickly under field pressure. Hard lessons, honest audits, and real-world feedback force us to refine continuously. We are building not only a product, but the trust of customers who visit our plants, challenge our test results, and stake livelihoods on the results.
By keeping Enterococcus faecium quality high—through strict strain management, careful fermentation, advanced preservation, and transparent, traceable documentation—we aim to build more than business. We foster a partnership between veterinary science, feed technology, and practical risk control for everyone who relies on modern microbial science.